In terms of safety, every industry is known for the catastrophes
that have befallen it. How an industry responds to a catastrophe is what sets
it apart from others. The aluminium industry can look back to singular
incident, a single catastrophe that shaped our industry to what it is today. On
that fateful day, on September 11, 1967 a molten explosion destroyed the
casthouse at the Reynolds Aluminum explosion. Four workers died and over 40
workers were injued. Our industry would never be the same. Prior to that incident
molten metal explosions occurred on regular basis. Resulting in damaged or destroyed
plants and workers were being killed and injured. The outcome of each incident
brought shame, bad publicity, or a shadow of the inflicted plant or specific
aluminium company. The Muscle Shoals explosion changed that. The scope of
damage and destruction that occurred at the Reynolds Aluminium casthouse had
never been seen before in our industry. Instead of ignoring it the aluminium
industry at that time decided that molten metal explosions were no longer a
plant issue, or a company issue. Now and in the future molten metal explosions
was an industry issue. For whatever the reason(s) were back then the result has
been a positive effect on safety in our industry to this day. Safety is an industry
issue now, and for the foreseeable it will remain an industry issue. The
Aluminium Plant Safety Blog has posted stories about the catastrophic aluminium
fine/dust explosion that killed hundreds of workers. Here is a follow up story to
that catastrophic:
At Japanese metalworking factories, it's not
unusual for potentially explosive metallic dust to be assiduously vacuumed from
the air every two hours. But removing metal flecks from the air was far less
routine – in fact, officials say, negligently infrequent – before an explosion
ripped through a Zhongrong Metal Products Co. auto wheel-polishing factory in
Kunshan, a gritty factory town in eastern China's Jiangsu Province, on August
2, 2014.
Management negligence toward what's
considered standard housekeeping at a metalworks factory was one reason cited
by investigators for the blast that killed at least 146 and injured 114 of the
265 employees on the job that fateful day.
That conclusion and others reached by a State
Council investigation team laid the groundwork for the recent convictions of three
Zhongrong executives and 11 government officials by the Kunshan City People's
Court on charges linked to the disaster. The decisions were announced in early
February by the provincial government.
Investigators uncovered a variety of safety
violations at the plant, where unfinished aluminum and alloy steel wheels for
new cars were polished for clients including the world's largest aluminum wheel
manufacturer, Citic Dicastal Wheel Manufacturing Co. Ltd., a main supplier of
major automakers such as General Motors. The plant was leveled in the blast,
and Zhongrong was closed by Jiangsu authorities in December 2014.
The workshop's 32, 13-meter-long production
lines – 16 on each of the building's two floors – were installed perilously
close to one another, according to the State Council report. In addition, the
factory was said to be poorly ventilated, and housekeeping regulations designed
to keep metalworking shops safe were ignored.
Investigators also faulted the 10-year-old
workshop's interior designer Jiangsu Huai'an Architecture Design Institute for
failing to heed dust-control safety standards.
Employees whose shift began at 6:40 a.m. on
the day of the disaster reported that the metallic dust in the air was so thick
that it was hard to see. Sparks from heat created by chemical reactions of
gathered aluminum dust exposed to water ignited the dust, creating a horrendous
ball of fire.
Heavy Toll
A Zhongrong production line worker who
witnessed the fireball and survived was Duan Chengming. He was working on the
first floor production line when the dust ignited.
Duan remembers hearing a blast that made his
ears ring and seeing flames that, within seconds, burned the clothes off his
back. He fled the factory with other workers, including many whose hair was
burning as they ran.
Song Chengqiang was working outside the
workshop when the explosion occurred. He said he saw a black mushroom cloud
rise above the building, which then quickly crumbled into rubble. He also saw
screaming workers, including many whose bodies were burning, running from the
factory.
Unhurt workers tried to help the injured and
extinguish the fire using the factory's firefighting equipment. But the
equipment proved inadequate against the blaze.
According to the State Council report, the
blast itself killed 47 people. Other victims died from burn wounds.
As of late March, some 19 months since the
disaster, more than 70 victims were still being treated in Kunshan-area
hospitals. Moreover, some victims officially listed as injured died in the
months after the list was released.
On the day of the explosion, hospitals and
doctors were overwhelmed by a flood of victims, many with bodies so severely
burned that relatives could not recognize them. Victims were admitted to more
than a dozen hospitals in eight neighboring cities including Suzhou, Changshu
and Shanghai.
At Shanghai's Ruijin Hospital, Dr. Zhang Qin
helped treat victims and later told reporters that "in 27 years as a
doctor, I have never seen any injuries as serious as those caused by this
blast." He also accurately predicted a high fatality rate.
At Shanghai's Changhai Hospital, Dr. Zhu
Shihun said most of the victims he treated suffered severe internal injuries
caused by the sheer power of the blast.
Duan was among 13 victims taken to a Suzhou
hospital, where five died. He spent a full month fully bandaged and lying in
the intensive care unit. Duan remembers the frightening pain of the weekly
wound-cleaning and bandage-changing procedure.
"Every Wednesday when we heard the
nurses' trolley" rolling down the hall to deliver fresh bandages "we
were scared," Duan said.
Tough Questions
After months in the hospital, Duan was
transferred to a rehabilitation center. There, he was reunited with his wife,
Li Chengcheng, who also worked at the Zhongrong plant and was not only severely
burned but lost a hand in the blast. In the future, doctors say, they'll each
need several surgeries.
The family of Duan and Li, who have a
9-year-old son, was one of many shattered by the tragedy. According to former
Zhongrong workers, many of those hired by Zhongrong had relatives who also
worked at the plant.
"My wife and I are injured," Duan
said. "What can we do about our future?" Many other explosion
survivors have asked questions for which answers have been few or nonexistent.
Most Zhongrong workers were recruited from
farming areas near Kunshan, and since the blast they've struggled to make a
living. They were initially attracted to the plant because of the relatively high
wages offered due to dusty, high-pressure work conditions.
Some questions have been aimed at the Kunshan
government, which in December 2015 released a plan for compensating victims and
their families that critics called inadequate. Zhongrong's owner – Taiwanese
businessman Wu Chi-tao – operated the workshop through a special Kunshan
government investor incentive program since the 1990s. The policies made
Kunshan a major destination for Taiwanese investment on the mainland, with as
many as some 4,200 Taiwan-funded companies operating in the area.
Zou Lingdong, who was honored as a hero for
saving lives in the disaster, lost his Zhongrong job and has struggled to find
work so he can pay school tuition for his two children. Song Chengqiang
survived the disaster and went back to farming, but has also had a hard time
making ends meet.
A group of surviving Zhongrong workers and
their relatives protested the victims' compensation plan during a December
rally outside a city government building in Kunshan. Some argued that payouts
may not be enough to cover necessary medical treatments.
One injured worker said in December that
officials told victims that those with lighter injuries would get one-time
payouts, while the severely injured would receive 90 percent of their salaries
while hospitalized. The worker said he and others wanted officials to clarify
the levels of compensation for lighter injuries and how future medical costs
will be covered before they will agree to the assessments.
Even before the explosion, many long-time
plant workers suffered from allergies and other health problems apparently
associated with metal dust. In 2012, 46-year-old Song Changxing was diagnosed
with pneumoconiosis, also known as black lung disease.
The plant's workers, who wore goggles and
cotton masks on the job, don't seem to have understood that working in a plant
filled with metallic dust can be dangerous.
Lu Jian, a researcher at Japan's National
Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, says metalworking shops must be
kept clean since dust containing flecks of aluminum, magnesium and other
materials is dangerous. In Japan, he said, some companies vacuum metallic dust
from the air every two hours.
Chinese government regulations say metalwork
plants should be cleaned once every eight-hour shift. Zhongrong blast survivors
said the plant was rarely cleaned beyond a little floor-sweeping every day at
noon. Sometimes the plant went a week or even one month without a cleaning.
Convicted in connection with violations of
plant safety were Zhongrong's chairman,
Wu Chi-tao; general manager, Lin Bochang; and senior manager, Wu Shengxian, the
official Xinhua News Agency reported. They were each removed from office and
sentenced to jail terms ranging from three years to seven and half years.
Eleven Kunshan city government officials in
charge of work safety supervision and environmental protection agencies were
found guilty of dereliction of duty and sentenced to prison terms, Xinhua said.
In addition, the State Council's
investigators said 35 other officials were punished. These included Shi Heping,
the vice governor of Jiangsu, who received professional demerits that will make
it more difficult from him to advance. Lu Jun was removed as mayor of Kunshan
and ousted from the Communist Party.
The Aluminium Plant Safety Blog normally does not post workers names
nor the company’s name when an injury or fatality occurs. But this incident was
different, it instantly made news globally. This catastrophe resulted with over 200
workers dying and scores of others injured. The question is how will our
industry respond? The APSB loves and is very proud of our industry. We feel
that one has to acknowledge the past to prepare for the future. Many in our
industry have acknowledge the hazards of aluminium dust/fines and have worked
hard to mitigate them on a daily basis. The APSB has visited many many plants
who have done a great job with housekeeping and not allowing for the
accumulation of aluminium fines. Unfortunately, there are some who fail to
acknowledge this hazard. The failure is because of lack of education,
ignorance, or on purpose. Regardless of the reason their workers suffer, and in
many ways our industry suffers too. We hope and pray that the catastrophe discussed
above never ever is repeated.
Please comment.
No comments:
Post a Comment