"right middle and ring fingers were amputated...."

Older machinery is a hidden hazard responsible for countless amputations. Here is an incident emphasizing the presence of hidden hazards in many workplaces:

 

A company and director has been fined $155,000 after parts of a worker's fingers had to be amputated following a workplace injury.

 

Director and company (name omitted) were sentenced and fined in local District Court on Monday over an incident in November 2018 where a worker suffered crushing injuries while operating a metal press. The ends of his right middle and ring fingers were amputated as a result.

 

(Government safety organization) investigated the incident and found the press wasn't properly guarded and didn't have the required emergency stop button. The investigation also found the machine hadn't operated as expected in the past and this wasn't identified as a risk.

 

(Company director name) was fined $35,000 and (company) was fined $120,000. (Company director’s) maximum penalty for his charge was $300,000, and the company's was $1.5 million.

 

In a written statement, the government safety organization's head of specialist interventions at the time of the accident, says the company's induction and staff training was haphazard and undocumented, and they couldn't show any evidence of the victim having been properly trained in using the press.

 

"What makes this case all the more concerning is that the company has had two previous convictions for incidents involving presses and injuries to workers' hands and fingers," the government safety organization's head of specialist interventions says.

 

"At the time of the incident the company was also non-compliant with three WorkSafe Improvement Notices relating to non-implementation of a health and safety manual; inadequate safe operating procedure; and training issues.

"With that history, (the director) should have known he had to step up and fix the litany of problems evident in his business. He did not, and a worker was unnecessarily injured."

 

The government safety organization's head of specialist interventions says the company director’s prosecution serves as a warning to other company directors that if they aren't making sure their operations are safe and healthy, they face enforcement under the Health and Safety at Work Act.

 

"Directors have explicit legal duties to undertake due diligence on their company's adherence to health and safety obligations and failing to do so not only puts their workers at risk, but it also puts them in our sights," the government safety organization's head of specialist interventions says.

 

"As governors of their businesses, they have more ability than anyone else to influence their business' operations to ensure they're taking all the steps required to protect workers and others on their sites from health and safety risks. If they're not doing so, they're failing in their duties."

We have compassion for all workers injured or killed in an incident. But, amputations are difficult for us because we acknowledge that this incident will always be close to the workers mind. Because all he has do, is look at his hand.

Government safety organizations enforce laws that were enacted to protect and safeguard workers. When companies do not follow these laws. Government safety organizations have a myriad of enforcement tools including monetary fines for the company and company managers. It is news media articles such as this that will send a shockwave through companies in this country. We hope that companies will find machinery that is in need of guarding.

Light Metal Age had a recent article about amputations hazards. It can be downloaded here.

 

Aluminium Times Magazine had two articles about machinery guarding. They can be downloaded here.

 

Please comment.