Rhetorical question. Who is the most dangerous person at a workplace? The answer we are looking for is that the most dangerous person at the workplace is not there yet. It is the visitor, contractor, vendor, etc. That is because these individuals do not know not the current safety procedures of the workplace. This recent story highlights the hazards associated with visitors in a workplace.
An aluminium company was
today fined $350,000 Euro and ordered to pay costs of $4,800 Eur after workers
received burns from an uncontrolled release of caustic solution at the
company’s (location omitted) alumina refinery.
The group of people
affected by the 2022 incident included school students on a work experience
placement at the site.
The aluminium company pleaded
guilty in the Magistrate’s Court for failing to ensure, so far as is reasonably
practicable, the health and safety of workers under the (pertinent government regulations).
On the day of the
incident, a contract worker noticed a burning smell and found a pump that was
emitting smoke and debris. The contract worker notified his shift supervisor
who attended the scene with other workers.
The shift supervisor
checked with the refinery’s control room to see if they could bring another
pump online to replace the damaged pump. A control room operator advised the
supervisor they would need to change the pump within a short time frame due to
potential production consequences.
The shift supervisor was
aware the pump could explode if pressure built up.
Having opened a discharge
drain valve, the shift supervisor left the valve to advise the work experience
group to leave the area. As he did so, another worker engaged in the pump
changeover pressed its start button unaware the discharge drain valve was still
open.
This action caused an
uncontrolled discharge of hot caustic solution from the discharge drainpipe.
The caustic solution
contacted a metal step in the open spoon drain which caused the liquid to spray
out and contact some of the workers and students.
Emergency response
officers attended the scene and provided first aid to those affected by the
spill before transferring them to the site’s medical centre.
The government safety
organization’s Commissioner said the workers and students were extremely lucky
not to have sustained more serious injuries.
“Companies must ensure all
people at a workplace, including work experience students, are kept safe,” The
government safety organization’s Commissioner said.
“Companies must also have robust controls in place and ensure these controls are monitored so they continue to be effective.”
We pray that all
of the injured students and workers recovered fully from their incident. We are
indeed shocked that this incident occurred. Because it appears that the visitors
were not given the proper ppe to tour the refinery. Or the visitors were not
wearing the ppe properly.
Regardless, this incident should not have occurred.
On our tours through the industry, we arrive at the workplace wearing fire resistant clothing. Commonly, our clothing fabric is better than our hosts’ clothing fabric. Unfortunately, 99% of visitors to workplaces arrive in street clothes. If the workplace does not have the proper ppe (including but not limited to fire/chemical resistant fabric) to provide for the visitors. The visitors should not be allowed in the departments where their current clothing is prohibited.
Instead, we recommend videos be shown to the visitors.
Please comment.
No comments:
Post a Comment