Tuesday, February 4, 2014

"There is no excuse not to use the right equipment..."


Falls are a persistent hazard found in all work environments in our industry. The Aluminium Plant Safety Blog has posted fall incidents associated with slippery, cluttered, or unstable walking/working surfaces; unprotected edges; floor holes and wall openings; unsafely positioned ladders; and misused fall protection. Government regulations and industry best practices provide specific measures and performance-based recommendations for fall prevention and protection. Here is a recent story involving an unsafe practice:

A United Kingdom firm has been fined after a worker injured his knee during unsafe work to clean high level light fittings.

The 22-year-old from United Kingdom, who does not want to be named, was unable to return to his normal duties for two months as a result of the incident at a die casting company July 2012. The company was prosecuted during the week of January 5, 2014 by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) after an investigation identified serious concerns with the chosen system of work for the cleaning. The Magistrates’ Court was told that workers accessed the light fittings using a goods stillage, a cage without fork channels, which is not designed to carry people. The goods stillage was raised into position by a fork lift truck.

Two to three hours into the job, the stillage had become so unstable that it fell with the worker inside. The cage landed three meters below on the concrete floor, injuring the worker who was still in it. HSE’s investigation found that nothing had been used to secure the stillage to the fork lift truck. The court heard that the die casting company had adopted this system of working at heights of above three metres on a regular basis for annual summer shutdown tasks since at least 2005. The company also used a similar system to carry out other maintenance activities, such as fitting pipework. The die casting products fined over £5,000 and ordered to pay £3,500 costs after pleading guilty to single breaches of the Work at Height Regulations 2005 and the Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998.

Speaking after the hearing HSE Inspector said: “This incident should never have happened. The company was using a totally inappropriate system of work for the task, which put various employees at risk of serious injury or even death from falling from height over a number of years.

“At the highest point the stillage was lifted around three metres from the ground and the worker is fortunate not to have been more seriously injured.

“The company had more than enough time to hire suitable lifting equipment, such as a mobile elevated work platform. There is no excuse not to use the right equipment and systems of work to do the job, and ensure there are adequate measures to prevent workers from falling from heights likely to cause injury.”

It is imperative that the appropriate equipment are used to perform the tasks as needed. This incident occurred after only numerous previous attempts resulted in no injuries. This facility was operating under a false safety belief. False safety beliefs are habits or practices that overtime have been thought to be safe but are actually not. Aluminium Insight had an article about False Safety Beliefs.
 
This article can be downloaded here.

Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) Fall Prevention Campaign has some very useful information. It can be viewed here.

The Health & Safety Executive has useful safety information too. It can be viewed here.

Youtube is a great source of training videos. Always check the date of upload to make sure the video is current. OSHA Training Institute has a video regarding fall protection. 


Please Comment.


1 comment:

Erwin Kriegel said...

In this particular case, it seems that the company has embraced or institutionalized an unsafe procedure, using inapropriate equipment. But in my professional life I have seen many more cases in which proper equipment was available, a safe procedure was in place, but workers refused to follow it, or to use the right equipment to work faster, or any other excuse. This is more difficult to avoid.